2026 College Football Quarterback Rankings

Best Quarterbacks in College Football for 2026

2026 college football quarterback rankings featuring Julian Sayin, Dante Moore, Arch Manning, Trinidad Chambliss, CJ Carr, Jayden Maiava and more ranked by tier

Julian Sayin is the SOG Sports No. 1 quarterback entering the 2026 college football season. Dante Moore and Arch Manning complete Tier 1, but the gap is narrow enough that all three can realistically finish the year as the best quarterback in the country.

These 2026 college football quarterback rankings forecast on-field value for the upcoming season. All 36 quarterbacks are ordered within their tiers, with 2025 performance, passing efficiency, decision-making, creation ability, rushing value, health, continuity and team context shaping the projection.

The top six all return to the same program, while 11 quarterbacks elsewhere on the list changed schools after the 2025 season. That makes proven production important, but it also makes fit and stability impossible to ignore.

How the 2026 College Football Quarterbacks Were Ranked

The primary question is simple: which quarterback is expected to provide the most college value in 2026? Recent production matters, but the evaluation goes deeper than passing yards or recruiting status. Accuracy, ball security, processing, pocket movement, pressure response, explosive-play creation and rushing value all affect where a quarterback belongs.

Team context works as a modifier rather than a shortcut. A strong offensive line, proven receivers and a championship roster can raise a quarterback’s ceiling, but they cannot replace quarterback play. The same principle works in reverse. A player is not automatically pushed down because his supporting cast is weaker if he has already shown that he can create efficient offense without ideal conditions.

Transfers are evaluated for the team they will represent in 2026. Scheme continuity, coaching changes, injury recovery and the certainty of a starting role influence the risk attached to each projection. NFL upside matters only as a secondary indicator of physical and processing talent. This is a college football ranking, not a 2027 NFL Draft board.

The tiers and the order within them are both intentional. The difference between the final player in one tier and the first player in the next is based on expected 2026 value, not career reputation.

Eligibility is limited to active FBS quarterbacks expected to compete for a starting role in 2026. The list ranks the top 36 rather than attempting to include every projected starter or unresolved quarterback competition.

Tier 1: Championship and Heisman Favorites

2026 college football quarterback rankings Tier 1 featuring Julian Sayin, Dante Moore and Arch Manning

Tier 1 of the 2026 college football quarterback rankings features Julian Sayin, Dante Moore and Arch Manning.

Tier 1 is reserved for quarterbacks with proven high-end production, championship-level team support and a realistic path to the Heisman Trophy. Sayin owns the safest projection, Moore may have the best blend of arm talent and command, and Manning finished 2025 playing well enough to close what once looked like a larger gap.

1. Julian Sayin

2026 team: Ohio State Buckeyes

Sayin led the FBS with a 77.0 percent completion rate, set a Big Ten single-season record in the category and finished with 3,610 passing yards and 32 touchdowns. He guided Ohio State through a 12-0 regular season and reached New York as a Heisman Trophy finalist during his first year as the starter.

The No. 1 ranking is built on repeatability. Sayin processes quickly, places the ball accurately and rarely turns routine plays into difficult ones. His eight interceptions included costly mistakes in Ohio State’s final two losses, so the next step is proving he can take control when the structure breaks down. He starts at No. 1 because his accuracy and decision-making give him the strongest floor in the best team environment.

2. Dante Moore

2026 team: Oregon Ducks

Moore passed for 3,565 yards and 30 touchdowns while completing nearly 72 percent of his attempts in his first season as Oregon’s starter. He controlled the line of scrimmage, created outside the pocket and played well enough to consider entering the NFL as a possible top-three pick before returning to Eugene.

Moore has a legitimate argument for No. 1 because he can threaten every part of the field without sacrificing efficiency. The separator for Sayin is that Moore struggled in Oregon’s two losses to eventual national champion Indiana and must now adjust to a new playcaller. If that transition is clean, Moore has every tool needed to finish above this ranking.

3. Arch Manning

2026 team: Texas Longhorns

Manning’s first full season as a starter was uneven, but the finish changed the 2026 outlook. He accounted for multiple touchdowns in five of his final six starts, topped 325 passing yards three times during a four-game SEC stretch and added 208 rushing yards with three scores against Texas A&M and Michigan.

The early-season inconsistency keeps him behind Sayin and Moore. Manning still completed only 61.4 percent of his passes across the full year, and Texas needs the late-season version to show up every week. His arm strength, functional mobility and improved command create a top-tier ceiling without needing the Manning name to do any of the ranking work.

Tier 2: National Stars With Tier 1 Upside

2026 college football quarterback rankings Tier 2 featuring Trinidad Chambliss, CJ Carr and Jayden Maiava

Tier 2 features Trinidad Chambliss, CJ Carr and Jayden Maiava.

Every Tier 2 quarterback can reach Tier 1. The difference is one additional projection question, whether it is Chambliss changing playcallers, Carr taking on a larger offensive burden or Maiava eliminating the turnover swings that followed some of his best performances.

4. Trinidad Chambliss

2026 team: Ole Miss Rebels

Few quarterbacks ended 2025 better than Chambliss. He produced three 300-yard passing games to finish the regular season, then added 921 passing yards with four touchdowns and no interceptions across three College Football Playoff games. He also completed 66.1 percent of his passes and ran for 527 yards with eight touchdowns.

Chambliss has already shown that his jump from Division II football can hold up against SEC and playoff competition. The uncertainty comes from the departure of Lane Kiffin and a transition to John David Baker as the primary offensive playcaller. Chambliss stays atop Tier 2 because his late-season processing, movement and ball security looked sustainable rather than fluky.

5. CJ Carr

2026 team: Notre Dame Fighting Irish

Carr completed 66.6 percent of his passes for 2,741 yards, 24 touchdowns and six interceptions during his first season as Notre Dame’s starter. His ability to anticipate windows and remain composed against pressure gave the Fighting Irish far more than simple game management.

The 2026 offense will ask more of him after two first-round running backs left for the NFL. That creates both opportunity and risk. Carr has the arm talent and processing speed to expand the passing game, but he must prove he can carry more of the weekly burden before moving into Tier 1.

6. Jayden Maiava

2026 team: USC Trojans

Maiava finished second nationally in Total QBR and fifth in passing yards with 3,711. He recorded multiple touchdowns in nine games, added six scores as a runner and consistently showed the toughness to keep attacking after taking contact in the pocket.

The downside was concentrated in the biggest losses. Maiava threw interceptions in seven of his final nine games and had two picks in three of USC’s four defeats. His combination of production, mobility and continuity with Lincoln Riley deserves a high ranking, but cleaner late-game decisions are the remaining condition for Tier 1.

Tier 3: Playoff-Caliber Quarterbacks

2026 college football quarterback rankings Tier 3 featuring Darian Mensah, Gunner Stockton, Sam Leavitt, Josh Hoover and Devon Dampier

Tier 3 features Darian Mensah, Gunner Stockton, Sam Leavitt, Josh Hoover and Devon Dampier.

Tier 3 contains quarterbacks capable of leading playoff teams, but each carries more uncertainty than the top six. Mensah, Leavitt and Hoover must translate their games to new programs. Stockton needs to expand an efficient Georgia offense, while Dampier must maintain his production without the coordinator who guided his last two seasons.

7. Darian Mensah

2026 team: Miami Hurricanes

Mensah led the ACC with 3,973 passing yards and 34 touchdowns at Duke while completing 66.8 percent of his attempts. He threw only six interceptions for the second straight season and repeatedly created accurate throws after leaving the pocket.

Miami gives him a playoff-ready stage, but it will be Mensah’s third program in three years after beginning at Tulane and moving through Duke. The transition is eased by Duke receiver Cooper Barkate joining him and Malachi Toney returning for the Hurricanes. His production belongs near the top of the list; the new system is what keeps him just outside Tier 2.

8. Gunner Stockton

2026 team: Georgia Bulldogs

Stockton completed 69.7 percent of his passes for 2,894 yards, 24 touchdowns and only five interceptions, then added 462 rushing yards and 10 scores. He helped Georgia win the SEC and delivered several of his sharpest performances against high-level competition.

His college value is higher than his NFL projection. Stockton makes quick decisions, protects the ball and gives Georgia real short-yardage value as a runner. To climb, he needs to show that the passing game can become a primary advantage rather than an efficient complement to the rest of the roster.

9. Sam Leavitt

2026 team: LSU Tigers

Leavitt’s 2025 season at Arizona State was cut short by a foot injury after seven games. He completed 60.7 percent of his passes for 1,628 yards, 10 touchdowns and three interceptions, falling short of the level he reached during Arizona State’s 2024 playoff run.

The LSU move reunites a creative dual-threat quarterback with Lane Kiffin, which raises the ceiling. Leavitt can extend plays and stress defenses as a runner, but health and accuracy remain real questions. Tier 3 reflects what he can become in the new offense without pretending the interrupted 2025 season did not happen.

10. Josh Hoover

2026 team: Indiana Hoosiers

Hoover arrives at Indiana with 9,629 career passing yards and 71 touchdowns after two and a half seasons as TCU’s starter. He threw for 3,472 yards in 2025 and has already shown he can handle a high-volume passing offense.

Indiana has elevated consecutive transfer quarterbacks under Curt Cignetti, but replacing Heisman winner Fernando Mendoza is a different standard. Hoover reads quickly and can distribute to an experienced supporting cast. His 33 career interceptions at TCU are the concern, especially for a program built around avoiding the mistakes that give close games away.

11. Devon Dampier

2026 team: Utah Utes

Dampier became the Big 12 Offensive Newcomer of the Year after producing at least 2,400 passing yards and 800 rushing yards with 34 total touchdowns. He also cut his interception total from 12 in 2024 to five in 2025.

His rushing ability changes the numbers in the box before the ball is snapped, and he improved enough as a passer to punish defenses for overplaying it. The risk is continuity. Coordinator Jason Beck left for Michigan, so Dampier must show that his growth travels into Kevin McGiven’s offense.

Tier 4: Proven Starters and Breakout Candidates

2026 college football quarterback rankings Tier 4 featuring Noah Fifita, Demond Williams Jr., Marcel Reed, Kevin Jennings and Drew Mestemaker

Tier 4 features Noah Fifita, Demond Williams Jr., Marcel Reed, Kevin Jennings and Drew Mestemaker.

Tier 4 is where the arguments become less about talent and more about consistency. Fifita and Jennings have large bodies of work, Williams and Reed offer high-end dual-threat ability, and Mestemaker led the country in passing yards. Each still needs to answer a specific question before joining the playoff-caliber tier.

12. Noah Fifita

2026 team: Arizona Wildcats

Fifita rebounded in 2025 to become Arizona’s first quarterback to earn first-team all-conference recognition since 1975. He enters his final season with 9,183 career passing yards and 785 completions, giving him one of the deepest experience profiles in the country.

His size limits some of the clean sight lines other quarterbacks enjoy, but his timing and anticipation compensate for it. Fifita belongs at the top of Tier 4 because he has already carried an offense through coaching change and roster turnover. The ceiling depends on Arizona giving him enough protection and receiving help to turn efficiency into more wins.

13. Demond Williams Jr.

2026 team: Washington Huskies

Williams completed 69.5 percent of his passes for 3,065 yards, 25 touchdowns and eight interceptions, then added 611 rushing yards and six scores. He can punish man coverage with his legs while keeping his eyes downfield long enough to create explosives after the original concept breaks.

The next step is proving the same game works against the strongest opponents. Williams failed to throw a touchdown against Ohio State and Oregon and also struggled in the loss to Michigan. He can rise several tiers if the electric stretches become reliable against playoff-level defenses.

14. Marcel Reed

2026 team: Texas A&M Aggies

Reed answered major passing questions for most of 2025, producing multiple touchdown passes in nine of the first 11 games. His 108 rushing yards and two touchdowns at LSU showed why a defense cannot treat him as a pocket-only quarterback.

The season ended with four interceptions and no touchdown passes in losses to Texas and Miami. He also loses first-round receiver KC Concepcion, who erased imperfect ball placement with his catch radius. Reed’s ability to create remains special, but his Tier 4 placement requires more consistent answers when opponents contain the designed run game.

15. Kevin Jennings

2026 team: SMU Mustangs

Jennings played through a severe ankle injury and still finished seventh nationally with 3,641 passing yards. He threw 26 touchdowns, completed 66 percent of his attempts and pushed his two-year totals to 6,886 yards and 46 scores.

His ability to change arm angles and deliver accurately outside a clean platform makes him difficult to finish as a pass rusher. Health is the concern. A fully mobile Jennings can outperform this ranking, but the punishment attached to his improvisational style gives him more weekly volatility than the quarterbacks above him.

16. Drew Mestemaker

2026 team: Oklahoma State Cowboys

Mestemaker led the FBS with 4,379 passing yards at North Texas, completed nearly 69 percent of his attempts and threw multiple touchdowns in 11 games. His path is unusual because he did not start at quarterback in high school, yet his processing speed quickly became the strength of Eric Morris’ offense.

He followed Morris and several North Texas teammates to Oklahoma State. The system continuity helps, but the level of weekly defense rises sharply in the Big 12 and the Cowboys are rebuilding much of the roster around him. Tier 4 respects the production while accounting for the transition.

Tier 5: High-Ceiling Quarterbacks With More Risk

2026 college football quarterback rankings Tier 5 featuring Rocco Becht, LaNorris Sellers, John Mateer, Byrum Brown, CJ Bailey and Conner Weigman

Tier 5 features Rocco Becht, LaNorris Sellers, John Mateer, Byrum Brown, CJ Bailey and Conner Weigman.

Tier 5 includes quarterbacks who have already produced at a high level but carry a larger scheme, health, consistency or transfer adjustment. Any member of this tier can deliver a top-15 season. The range of possible outcomes is simply wider.

17. Rocco Becht

2026 team: Penn State Nittany Lions

Becht moves to Penn State with Matt Campbell after starting 39 consecutive games at Iowa State and winning 26 of them. His Iowa State career included 9,274 passing yards, 64 passing touchdowns and 19 rushing scores, giving the Nittany Lions an experienced organizer for a major program reset.

Continuity with Campbell protects Becht from the usual transfer learning curve, but Big Ten defenses will challenge his arm and pocket movement differently. He ranks first in Tier 5 because his decision-making and leadership provide the safest floor in the group, even if the explosive ceiling is lower than several names below him.

18. LaNorris Sellers

2026 team: South Carolina Gamecocks

Sellers entered 2025 with major expectations, then saw his completion rate fall from 65.6 to 60.8 percent and his passing touchdowns drop from 18 to 13. South Carolina went 1-7 in SEC play, while his rushing production declined from 674 yards in 2024 to 270.

The physical profile remains difficult to match. Sellers can shrug off contact, attack vertically and create offense without a clean pocket. New coordinator Kendal Briles should simplify the decisions and restore more designed rushing. The ranking reflects his enormous ceiling and the need to prove that 2025 was a detour rather than a trend.

19. John Mateer

2026 team: Oklahoma Sooners

Mateer opened 2025 with 1,215 passing yards and 190 rushing yards in four games before a broken thumb required surgery. His efficiency never fully recovered, and he finished with 14 passing touchdowns, 11 interceptions and eight rushing scores.

A healthy offseason gives him a chance to recover the creativity and aggressive downfield play he showed at Washington State and early at Oklahoma. Mateer can make difficult plays look easy, but he also invites unnecessary danger when the first answer disappears. Tier 5 is the right balance between the pre-injury upside and the full-season evidence.

20. Byrum Brown

2026 team: Auburn Tigers

Brown surpassed 3,100 passing yards in both of his full seasons as South Florida’s starter and combined for 54 touchdowns against 18 interceptions on 766 attempts. Across 2023 and 2025, he also ran for 1,817 yards and 25 touchdowns.

He follows coach Alex Golesh to Auburn, so the language and core concepts will be familiar even as the speed of SEC defenses changes the margin for error. Brown’s size and rushing power give Auburn an immediate offensive identity. The question is whether his passing efficiency survives when the windows close faster every week.

21. CJ Bailey

2026 team: NC State Wolfpack

Bailey made a clear second-year jump, adding nearly 700 passing yards, raising his completion percentage by 3.9 points and throwing eight more touchdowns with one fewer interception. At 6-foot-6, he can see the middle of the field and still offers enough movement to have scored 11 career rushing touchdowns.

The week-to-week accuracy remains inconsistent. Bailey completed at least 69.6 percent of his passes in nine games but fell below 57 percent three times. His development is moving in the right direction, and another similar step would make Tier 5 look conservative.

22. Conner Weigman

2026 team: Houston Cougars

Weigman finally completed a healthy season and responded with 2,706 passing yards, 25 touchdowns and nine interceptions. He also ran for 700 yards and 11 scores while helping Houston win 10 games.

For the first time in his college career, he will work with the same offensive coordinator in consecutive seasons. That continuity matters for a quarterback whose path has been interrupted by injuries and repeated system changes. The next test is producing the same efficiency when Houston faces the best teams on its schedule and enters games as the hunted rather than the surprise.

Tier 6: Young Risers and Productive Veterans

2026 college football quarterback rankings Tier 6 featuring Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele, Bear Bachmeier, Anthony Colandrea, Bryce Underwood, Avery Johnson, Brad Jackson and Katin Houser

Tier 6 features Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele, Bear Bachmeier, Anthony Colandrea, Bryce Underwood, Avery Johnson, Brad Jackson and Katin Houser.

Tier 6 combines younger quarterbacks who could make a major developmental jump with veterans whose production is easier to trust than their ceiling. This group is deep enough that one clean offseason adjustment could create several large ranking swings.

23. Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele

2026 team: California Golden Bears

Sagapolutele passed for 3,454 yards as a true freshman, completing 64.2 percent of his attempts and topping 200 yards in every game. He finished with three 300-yard performances in his final four appearances despite inconsistent protection and a receiving group that left plays on the field.

Cal retained him through a coaching change and added more help around him. His willingness to stand in against pressure and attack intermediate windows gives him one of the highest long-term ceilings in this half of the ranking. He remains in Tier 6 because the next step must include more consistent scoring and late-game control.

24. Bear Bachmeier

2026 team: BYU Cougars

Bachmeier arrived at BYU in May 2025, unexpectedly won the job and produced more than 3,000 passing yards with 527 rushing yards and 11 rushing touchdowns as a true freshman. He helped the Cougars win 12 games and reach the Big 12 Championship Game.

His toughness and ability to avoid negative plays already translate to winning football. BYU wants to reduce his rushing workload and expand the passing game after a full offseason in the system. That development is the difference between remaining a productive dual-threat starter and jumping multiple tiers.

25. Anthony Colandrea

2026 team: Nebraska Cornhuskers

Colandrea won Mountain West Player of the Year at UNLV after passing for 3,459 yards and 23 touchdowns while adding 649 rushing yards and 10 scores. He now brings starting experience from Virginia and UNLV to a Nebraska offense searching for a dependable playmaker.

His escape ability can stabilize protection because defenders cannot rush past the quarterback without consequence. The risk is that Colandrea has sometimes created his own chaos while hunting the big play. Nebraska needs the explosive movement without the avoidable mistakes that have followed it.

26. Bryce Underwood

2026 team: Michigan Wolverines

Underwood flashed the arm strength and movement that made him the No. 1 recruit in the 2025 class, particularly in wins over Washington and Maryland. His accuracy faded late, however, and he threw seven interceptions across his final five games.

Michigan retained him through a major coaching change, but he must learn a new offense under Kyle Whittingham and coordinator Jason Beck. Underwood may have the highest pure ceiling in Tier 6. The placement reflects how much projection is still required after an uneven freshman season.

27. Avery Johnson

2026 team: Kansas State Wildcats

Johnson has started every game for two seasons and is already tied for Kansas State’s career record with 48 passing touchdowns. He also owns 5,576 passing yards and 1,378 quarterback rushing yards, yet the Wildcats are 15-10 across his two years as the full-time starter.

New coach Collin Klein recruited Johnson and understands how to make quarterback rushing a structural advantage. That reunion creates a real rebound case. Johnson stays below the younger risers because his passing development has leveled off, but a more natural offensive fit can still unlock his best season.

28. Brad Jackson

2026 team: Texas State Bobcats

Jackson broke out as a redshirt freshman with 3,224 passing yards, 21 touchdowns and seven interceptions while completing 71.3 percent of his attempts. He added 744 rushing yards and 17 touchdowns, giving Texas State one of the most productive dual-threat quarterbacks in the country.

The ranking is not a dismissal of Group of Five production. It accounts for how much of Jackson’s résumé was built during one season and how quickly defenses will adjust to his running. If the passing efficiency holds while Texas State asks more of him, he has a credible path into the top 20.

29. Katin Houser

2026 team: Illinois Fighting Illini

Houser transferred from East Carolina to Illinois after throwing for 3,300 yards, 19 touchdowns and six interceptions with a 65.9 percent completion rate. He added nine rushing scores and enters 2026 with 26 career starts.

His experience gives Illinois a stable replacement for Luke Altmyer, and returning to the Big Ten is not unfamiliar after beginning his career at Michigan State. Houser earns the final Tier 6 spot because his floor is higher than the quarterbacks below him. The ceiling depends on becoming more efficient in obvious passing situations against a stronger weekly schedule.

Tier 7: Talented Quarterbacks With Major Questions

2026 college football quarterback rankings Tier 7 featuring Malik Washington, DJ Lagway, Colton Joseph, Mason Heintschel, Beau Pribula, Kamario Taylor and Nico Iamaleava

Tier 7 features Malik Washington, DJ Lagway, Colton Joseph, Mason Heintschel, Beau Pribula, Kamario Taylor and Nico Iamaleava.

Tier 7 is not a list of irrelevant quarterbacks. It includes major physical talent, proven production and several players capable of jumping into the top 20. The lower placement reflects a larger concern involving decision-making, supporting cast, health, transfer fit or a limited sample as the starter.

30. Malik Washington

2026 team: Maryland Terrapins

Washington set Maryland freshman records with 2,963 passing yards and 273 completions, adding 17 touchdown passes. He became only the second Big Ten freshman since 1996 to combine at least 2,500 passing yards with 300 rushing yards.

Maryland retained a promising young quarterback after a difficult team season, which matters. Washington can make high-level throws and brings more mobility than the offense consistently used in 2025. His placement reflects the protection and roster questions around him, not a lack of individual upside.

31. DJ Lagway

2026 team: Baylor Bears

Lagway transferred to Baylor after two seasons at Florida that showed both his rare arm strength and his current volatility. He threw for 2,264 yards and 16 touchdowns in 2025, but his 14 interceptions pushed his two-year total to 23.

Baylor’s pass-heavy offense should create more defined opportunities to attack downfield, and Lagway can make field-side throws that most college quarterbacks should not attempt. The talent belongs much higher. Tier 7 reflects the fact that he did not produce consecutive interception-free games in 2025 and must now learn another system.

32. Colton Joseph

2026 team: Wisconsin Badgers

Joseph won Sun Belt Offensive Player of the Year at Old Dominion after passing for 2,624 yards and 21 touchdowns while rushing for 1,007 yards and 13 scores. He was one of only two FBS quarterbacks to combine 2,000 passing yards with 1,000 rushing yards in 2025.

Wisconsin needs the improvisation and rushing threat he provides, but the transfer also represents a sharp increase in weekly defensive quality. Joseph threw 10 interceptions and completed 59.7 percent of his passes last season. His production is undeniable; the Power Four translation is the question.

33. Mason Heintschel

2026 team: Pittsburgh Panthers

Heintschel took over a month into his freshman season and finished with 2,354 passing yards and 16 touchdowns in nine starts. He went 6-3, topped 300 yards four times and opened his starting career with 323 yards and four scores against Boston College.

Pittsburgh kept him despite outside transfer interest, giving the offense continuity with coordinator Kade Bell. Heintschel has already shown pocket toughness and touch, but the sample is still small. A full offseason as QB1 makes him one of the strongest breakout bets in Tier 7.

34. Beau Pribula

2026 team: Virginia Cavaliers

Pribula moves from Missouri to Virginia after completing 67.4 percent of his passes for 1,941 yards, 11 touchdowns and nine interceptions. He added 297 net rushing yards and six scores, went 7-3 as the starter and returned late in the year after dislocating his ankle.

He enters camp as Virginia’s lead option but must hold off Pittsburgh transfer Eli Holstein. Pribula’s running gives the offense a clear identity, while his passing must become more consistent when defenses force him to win from the pocket. The role competition and another transfer adjustment keep him in Tier 7.

35. Kamario Taylor

2026 team: Mississippi State Bulldogs

Taylor played significant snaps only late in 2025 but ran for 366 yards and seven touchdowns over his final five games. His 173 rushing yards and two scores against playoff-bound Ole Miss showed why his first full season as the starter deserves attention.

The projection depends on passing development. Jeff Lebby’s offense can create defined throws and explosive opportunities, but SEC defenses will force Taylor to win after taking away the first read and designed quarterback run. His athletic ceiling is far above No. 35; his experience as a complete starter is not.

36. Nico Iamaleava

2026 team: UCLA Bruins

Iamaleava remained at UCLA after a turbulent 2025 season that included early coaching changes, 27 sacks and major week-to-week swings. He struggled badly against Indiana but also accounted for five touchdowns against Penn State and finished with 505 rushing yards.

New coach Bob Chesney inherits a 6-foot-6 quarterback with obvious arm talent and athletic ability. The concern is whether UCLA can give him enough structure to rebuild his processing and confidence. Iamaleava is last because his range of outcomes is the widest on the list, not because the physical tools disappeared.

What the 2026 Quarterback Rankings Reveal

Continuity separates the top of the list from the middle. All six quarterbacks in Tiers 1 and 2 return to the same school, while 11 of the 36 ranked players changed programs after 2025. Several transfers bring better raw production than the players above them, but learning a new offense and adjusting to different competition creates real projection risk.

Passing yards alone do not control the order. Mestemaker led the FBS with 4,379 yards and ranks 16th because he is moving from North Texas to the Big 12. Mensah led the ACC in yards and touchdowns but sits seventh while transferring to Miami. Jackson produced nearly 4,000 total yards at Texas State and ranks 28th because the résumé spans one full season outside the Power Four.

The top tier is also more complete than a simple NFL prospect list would suggest. Sayin’s accuracy, Moore’s arm talent and Manning’s late-season growth create different paths to the same destination. The ranking favors expected college performance, which is why proven runners such as Chambliss, Stockton and Dampier remain close even when draft projections differ.

The Closest Tier Decisions

Julian Sayin over Dante Moore

Moore may own the broader physical tool set, but Sayin’s 77.0 percent completion rate and command across an unbeaten regular season create the stronger week-to-week projection. The margin disappears if Moore handles Oregon’s playcaller change and improves against the very best defenses.

Trinidad Chambliss over CJ Carr

Carr has the cleaner NFL profile and a stable Notre Dame environment. Chambliss gets the edge because his late-season run included dominant passing production against playoff competition plus meaningful rushing value. The new Ole Miss playcaller is the main variable.

Jayden Maiava over Darian Mensah

Mensah had more passing yards and touchdowns in 2025, but Maiava returns to the same coach and offense after finishing second nationally in Total QBR. Mensah can pass him quickly if his efficiency transfers from Duke to Miami without a settling-in period.

Devon Dampier over Noah Fifita

Fifita is the more polished pure passer and has a much longer record of production. Dampier’s 800-yard rushing threat and improved ball security create more ways to control a game, giving him the final Tier 3 position despite the coordinator change.

Drew Mestemaker over Rocco Becht

Becht has 39 consecutive starts and far more Power Four experience. Mestemaker gets the higher ceiling because his accuracy, processing and 4,379-yard season give him a chance to become Oklahoma State’s immediate offensive engine. The Big 12 transition makes this the sharpest boundary on the list.

Complete 2026 College Football Quarterback Rankings Table

SOG Sports 2026 college football quarterback rankings by tier
RankQuarterbackTeamTier
1Julian SayinOhio State Buckeyes1
2Dante MooreOregon Ducks1
3Arch ManningTexas Longhorns1
4Trinidad ChamblissOle Miss Rebels2
5CJ CarrNotre Dame Fighting Irish2
6Jayden MaiavaUSC Trojans2
7Darian MensahMiami Hurricanes3
8Gunner StocktonGeorgia Bulldogs3
9Sam LeavittLSU Tigers3
10Josh HooverIndiana Hoosiers3
11Devon DampierUtah Utes3
12Noah FifitaArizona Wildcats4
13Demond Williams Jr.Washington Huskies4
14Marcel ReedTexas A&M Aggies4
15Kevin JenningsSMU Mustangs4
16Drew MestemakerOklahoma State Cowboys4
17Rocco BechtPenn State Nittany Lions5
18LaNorris SellersSouth Carolina Gamecocks5
19John MateerOklahoma Sooners5
20Byrum BrownAuburn Tigers5
21CJ BaileyNC State Wolfpack5
22Conner WeigmanHouston Cougars5
23Jaron-Keawe SagapoluteleCalifornia Golden Bears6
24Bear BachmeierBYU Cougars6
25Anthony ColandreaNebraska Cornhuskers6
26Bryce UnderwoodMichigan Wolverines6
27Avery JohnsonKansas State Wildcats6
28Brad JacksonTexas State Bobcats6
29Katin HouserIllinois Fighting Illini6
30Malik WashingtonMaryland Terrapins7
31DJ LagwayBaylor Bears7
32Colton JosephWisconsin Badgers7
33Mason HeintschelPittsburgh Panthers7
34Beau PribulaVirginia Cavaliers7
35Kamario TaylorMississippi State Bulldogs7
36Nico IamaleavaUCLA Bruins7

Frequently Asked Questions

Are the quarterbacks ordered within each tier?

Yes. The tiers show meaningful groups, but the order inside every tier also reflects the SOG Sports projection. Julian Sayin is No. 1 overall, while Nico Iamaleava is No. 36.

Is this ranking based only on 2025 statistics?

No. The 2025 season is the strongest evidence available, but the ranking also considers efficiency, decision-making, rushing value, health, coaching, supporting cast, role certainty and how each skill set is expected to translate in 2026.

How are transfer quarterbacks evaluated?

Transfers are ranked for their new 2026 team. Prior production establishes the baseline, while scheme familiarity, coaching continuity, surrounding talent and the change in competition determine how much risk is attached to the projection.

Why does team context matter in an individual quarterback ranking?

A quarterback does not control protection, route quality or playcalling, so team context changes what he will realistically be asked to do. It remains a modifier rather than the main criterion. Strong surroundings cannot cover poor quarterback play for an entire season.

Does NFL Draft potential affect the rankings?

Only as a secondary indicator. Arm talent, processing and mobility can matter in both evaluations, but this list ranks expected college performance in 2026. A productive college quarterback can rank highly without carrying a first-round NFL projection.

Last Reviewed: August 28, 2026

Final Verdict

Julian Sayin opens 2026 at No. 1 because his accuracy, processing and Ohio State environment create the strongest combination of floor and championship upside. Dante Moore and Arch Manning are close enough to take the spot, while the deeper story is uncertainty: 11 ranked quarterbacks changed schools, and several of the most productive players must prove their games translate to a new system or level of competition.

See how each quarterback’s supporting cast compares in the 2026 college football power rankings.

Related Articles